Thursday, April 8, 2010

What's your real age?

One of my Tumblr crushes, Katie, posted yesterday about an online test that tells you your "real age," versus your chronological age. So, of course, I immediately clicked over and took the test.

I was a little worried, mostly because of my high BMI, but also because Katie is healthy and athletic and she got a real age result that was a couple years higher than her actual age, so I was envisioning the thing telling me that I am 50 in terms of health and if I don't fix things soon I will age to 80 over the course of the next three years.

But I took the test anyway, and entered in all this info about my health, including metrics like cholesterol, blood pressure, and resting heart rate, plus health conditions and family history, and then a ton of questions about diet, exercise, and lifestyle. Then I waited for my results, telling myself that I'd be happy with anything in the 20s.

And... it said that I have a "real age" of 22.9. Almost exactly three years younger than I actually am.

Now, I have to say, I think this is a flawed test. I mean, my BMI is high. And while I generally have a pretty healthy lifestyle, and I eat pretty well and I exercise regularly, and I don't drink or smoke or engage in high-risk behaviors... I am no Ironman, you know? I have a lot of weight left to lose and I don't work out seven days a week and I don't eat enough vegetables and my grandmother had breast cancer. How could this test say that Katie, who is so healthy, is several years older than her actual age, and then tell me that I am several years younger? It just doesn't make sense.

But still, ridiculous as it was, it made me feel better about my health. Like oh, it's not just me who sees this health indicators as being meaningful. And oh, maybe my BMI isn't the be-all and end-all that all those people who love to scream and shriek about the obesity crisis would have you believe. Maybe it's just one piece of a much broader picture. That's what I've always thought, but I wouldn't have thought that a website like this would agree.

Anyway! Now I want to find out if it skews down for everyone and Katie just somehow gave an answer that upset the test. So! Go take the test, and then come back here and tell me what it said your real age is compared to your actual age, and what you think about it. I'm dying to hear what everyone's results are!

21 comments:

  1. Mine said 25.8, which is almost 5 years younger than I am. We had a health assessment done at work, and that told me that my real age is the same as my current age.

    ReplyDelete
  2. It said my age was 25.4 when I'm really 28.5 years. I still need to lose about 30 lbs so that is surpising but I AM in good health and eat very healthfully.

    ReplyDelete
  3. I am 41.3 and it said my "real age" (website) is 34.4.
    Okaaayyyy I'll take it and run with it (being a runner and all) but who knows how true it all is.

    ReplyDelete
  4. my "real age" is 4 years younger than i am (yay!) - 29.5 for real, 25.4 according to them. i'll take it!! :-)

    ReplyDelete
  5. I got 30 (I'll be 26 next month). I am average weight, exercise occassionally, and walk almost everywhere. I think family history is a huge factor for it.

    ReplyDelete
  6. Wahoo! My biological age is 34.1 and my "Real" age is 29.1! Those veggies are working!

    ReplyDelete
  7. Also, I love that one of my recommendations is to "stop worrying." If it were that easy, I wouldn't be worried!

    ReplyDelete
  8. 4.3 years older. I have a really bad family history and am diabetic (along with both my parents, one of whom is dead) so yeah, wasnt expecting to be younger lol.

    ReplyDelete
  9. I'm 23, and got 30. Wasn't expecting it to be lower/same - and I know that in a year or so that "real age" is going to drop dramatically with the surgery & quitting smoking & excerising regularly.

    ReplyDelete
  10. I'm 25.9 and my real age is...17.6. Ridiculous. I think the family history part and the fact that I walk to work every day (and am almost never in a moving vehicle) had a lot to do with it. Still, that's crazy.

    ReplyDelete
  11. I'm 26, and I got 31.4-- I know I've done this test before and have gotten a different result, but can't remember what might have been different. I'm a little suspicious of Real Age because I feel like there is a lot of corporate sponsorship going on, and I eventually ended up marking so many of their promo emails as spam that they just fell off my radar. Given that, I'm taking this result with a grain of salt...

    ReplyDelete
  12. I think it's several things:

    1. There is so much focus on WEIGHT in the health culture that even when we're aware that it's not the main thing, we still get skewed. Smoking and drinking and wearing a seatbelt are way more important.

    2. That test is a big corprorate survey, and most of the questions have nothing to do with a person's real age.

    ReplyDelete
  13. My real age is 27.5, and My RealAge™ is 27.0. Awesome.

    ReplyDelete
  14. Mine said 27.7 and I'm 32. I never know how to accurately fill out the questionnaires about how many servings of such and such food I'm eating. They said I needed to eat more of everything which is hilarious. I must not have filled that part out right.

    ReplyDelete
  15. I am usually wary of these kinds of test ... mostly because they are a tool for collecting information about you that they can unleash on you through spam, err, I mean advertising. =)

    That said, I took the test. And it has me as being over 4 years younger than I am (yay!). Though, in looking at the results, it dings you when you don't know information (versus considering it neutral) and it dinged me for checking off ONE stress factor out of a list of 10. Really? Whatever.

    ReplyDelete
  16. Mine was 38.7, which is 2.5 years younger. This is with a high BMI too so go figure. (:-D

    Fun!

    ReplyDelete
  17. I'm 24; it said my real age was 17. Which, nice as it was to hear, is not at all accurate, I don't think.

    I do think family history plays a big role -- it asked about diseases that don't run in my family, but didn't ask about heart attacks or strokes, which my family has a ton of.

    ReplyDelete
  18. I'm 22.9 and it said 15.4 (or 15. something... I kind of forget, I did it yesterday after reading Katie's post). It really must have just skewed Katie somehow based on 1 weird answer or something. I mean, it takes points off if you don't have a dog, so... I'm not sure how great of a test this is.

    ReplyDelete
  19. Apparently my RealAge is 27, a year younger - in reality I'm 28. Hmm. I had to put "I Don't Know" for some questions, and I'm thinking that's where the flaw was.

    ReplyDelete
  20. I am 27. My real age is 34.5

    Awesome. (You can squeegee that sarcasm off your screen now.)
    xox

    ReplyDelete